PMSI - Settlement Solutions PMSI - Settlement Solutions

MSPRC Announces Issuance of Rights and Responsibilities (RAR) Letters will Resume June 10th

By , May 31, 2011 2:48 pm

PMSI has been informed that the MSPRC has completed their review of the RAR letter.  Issuance of the RAR is anticipated to resume on June 10, 2011. A copy of the revised RAR will be made available by that time on the MSPRC website.   

The Demand letter for liability insurance (including self-insurance), no-fault insurance and workers’ compensation still remains under review. The MSPRC is still working cases and Demand letters will be mailed out once this review is complete.   

It is recommended that clients begin the conditional payment verification process as necessary to get their cases in line for processing.  The MSPRC has confirmed that once the suspension has been lifted cases will be worked in the order that they were received.

PMSI remains in contact with the MSPRC and will continue to monitor this issue.  We will advise our clients accordingly as additional information is received.  

Share

MSPRC Announces Temporary Suspension of Rights and Responsibilities and Demand Letters

By , May 25, 2011 2:54 pm

PMSI has been informed that the MSPRC has temporarily suspended the issuance of Rights and Responsibilities (RAR) Letters and Demand letters.  The following notice has been posted on the MSPRC website:

“Issuance of the Rights and Responsibilities (“RAR”) and Demand letters has been temporarily suspended while these letters are under review.  The MSPRC is still working cases, and the RAR and Demand letters will be mailed out once appropriate revisions have been made”. 

The MSPRC has not confirmed how long this suspension of RAR and Demand letters will last and has stated that they are still working cases outside of the above noted suspensions.  Conditional payment letters (CPLs) will be issued on cases where the RAR has already been issued.  However, the conditional payment process will be suspended on cases where a RAR has not yet been issued as well as those cases where a final Demand has been requested.  PMSI will continue our current follow up process for all current pending cases at the MSPRC even in light of the current situation. 

It is recommended that clients begin the conditional payment verification process as necessary even in light of this announcement to get their cases in line for processing.  The MSPRC has confirmed that once the suspension has been lifted cases will be worked in the order that they were received.

PMSI remains in contact with the MSPRC and will continue to monitor this issue.  We will advise our clients accordingly as additional information is received. 

Share

CMS Issues Memorandum Reiterating WCMSA Voluntary Review Thresholds

By , May 23, 2011 3:11 pm

CMS recently issued a Memorandum dated May 11, 2011 confirming there are no statutory or regulatory provisions requiring a WCMSA be submitted to CMS for review.  Submission of a WCMSA proposal to CMS for review and approval is a voluntary process which is recommended by CMS, but not required.  This statement in writing by CMS should eliminate any confusion in the industry surrounding this issue which is important in light of proposed State workers’ compensation legislation enacting requirements which require submission of WCMSAs to CMS for review and approval if the CMS review threshold is met (Maryland). 

If the WCMSA review process is utilized, CMS requests compliance with their established policies and procedures.  The industry is encouraged to regularly monitor the CMS dedicated workers’ compensation website for changes in policies/procedures.  

Below is a summary of the important information in the Memorandum which provides clarification of CMS’ current policy and procedure regarding review of WCMSAs. 

  1. A WCMSA should not be submitted to CMS when the resolution of the workers’ compensation claim results in the medical portion of the claim being left open.
  2. CMS will review a WCMSA when either of the following thresholds are met:
    • The claimant is currently a Medicare beneficiary and the total settlement amount is greater than $25,000 . 
    • The claimant has a “reasonable expectation” of Medicare enrollment within 30 months of the settlement date and the anticipated total settlement amount for future medical expenses and disability/lost wages over the life or duration of the settlement agreement is expected to be greater than $250,000.
  3. CMS no longer reviews new WCMSA proposals if the above thresholds are not met. However, these threshold requirements reflect a CMS operational workload standard and do not constitute a substantive dollar or “safe harbor” threshold. CMS confirmed that Medicare beneficiaries still must consider Medicare’s interests in all workers’ compensation cases and ensure that Medicare is the secondary payer.
  4. Both the beneficiary and non-beneficiary review thresholds noted above are subject to change and CMS reserves the right to modify or eliminate these thresholds.

Click here to view a copy of the entire Memorandum.

Share

Florida Bar Opinion: Unethical for Plaintiff’s Counsel to Agree to Indemnify the Defendant for Medicare Liabilities

By , May 19, 2011 7:28 pm

On April 1, 2011, the Florida Bar issued Staff Opinion 30310. The opinion arose out of a dispute between opposing counsels in a personal injury lawsuit. The attorneys specifically sought the Florida Bar’s ethical opinion on whether an attorney, in a personal injury matter, “may personally sign a settlement release containing a hold harmless and indemnification agreement in favor of the opposing party which would obligate the plaintiff’s attorney to indemnify and hold harmless the defendant for any future liability under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSP).”

Continue reading 'Florida Bar Opinion: Unethical for Plaintiff’s Counsel to Agree to Indemnify the Defendant for Medicare Liabilities'»

Share

Panorama Theme by Themocracy