A look at the results and what’s ahead for the controversial MSP Act.
As required by section 1862(b) of the Social Security Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has reviewed the costs related to collecting Medicare’s conditional payments and compared this to recovery amounts. The full report, released November 15, 2018, is available here. As a result of the computation, the threshold for physical trauma-based liability insurance settlements will remain at $750 in 2019.
On August 6, 2018, in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Florence Division, Humana Insurance Company (Humana) brought an action against Bi-Lo, LLC (Defendant), a Delaware limited liability company that sells groceries in the southeastern region of the United States. Humana’s action is for declaratory judgment to recover double damages pursuant the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSP) in the amount of $32,754.02 due and owing to Humana, as a Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO), by virtue of payments made on behalf of one of its enrollees, a Medicare beneficiary who elected Medicare Advantage coverage from Humana. This occurred despite the existence of a settlement agreement in which the enrollee and her counsel agreed to be responsible for such reimbursement. However, because the enrollee/counsel did not reimburse the Medicare payments advanced by Humana, Humana again seeks reimbursement from the Corporate Defendant.
In a recent decision on 3/13/2018, Mayo v. NYU Langone Medical Center, the courts voided a settlement on the grounds of a mutual mistake because both the plaintiff and defense relied upon a conditional payment notice rather than a conditional payment demand or initial determination. The plaintiff provided a conditional payment notice that was dated … Read moreDon’t Rely on an MSP Conditional Payment Notice when Executing a Settlement Agreement and General Release